Oct 13

Willis: Superb 62

Second round collated scores

Garrett Willis came within a whisker of the course record at TPC Summerlin as he shot a sparkling 62 to move into a share of the lead after the second round of the Frys.com Open.

The 33-year-old from North Carolina came within a shot of matching Davis Love III who posted a 61 back in 2001, and finished the day tied with DJ Trahan and George McNeill on -13, both of whom played at the neighbouring TPC Canyons.

The trio stand one shot clear of Jason Gore and John Huston, while Nick Watney is all on his own in sixth on -11.

Willis, who has fluctuated between the PGA Tour and the Nationwide Tour for the last three years, admitted he feared the worst on Friday when he arrived at the course later than scheduled.

“I got a slow start out of the hotel this morning,” he stated. “When you have a 7:10 tee time and you’re staying in Vegas it’s tough to get to bed at a decent hour.

“I only warmed up for about 20 minutes prior to the round. I hit the first fairway and was pretty pleased but bogeyed the second hole and my first thought was: ‘Great, you put yourself in a position where you’ll have to grind it out for the cut’.”

Starting at the tenth, Willis bogeyed the 11th, but hit back with birdie at 12 and picked up three more shots to reach the turn in 33 strokes.

Willis then raced home in just 29 shots as he scorched up the leaderboard with a further five birdies and an eagle at the par-five third.

John Daly came close to matching Willis’ heroics as he carded a superb 63, covering his back nine in just 28 shots.

The big-hitting American, who managed ten birdies and an eagle during his round, now stands at six-under following his first-round 74.

  • EuroTour Schedule
  • World Rankings
  • Golf live on Sky Sports

Source: www.skysports.com

Oct 13

Now this is more like it. This is what Saturdays are all about. England’s barstool jury hesitates before its favourite dilemma: heady delusion one way, weary disillusion the other. But hey, if you like it that much, perhaps you should try horseracing. Betting lets you do that kind of thing every day.

As though in deference to the endeavours of Michael Owen – himself a racing man, of course – and Jonny Wilkinson, racing has tastefully confined itself to a fairly quiet Saturday. After all, the sport badly needs to restore its bearings, get back to basics. This has been its most emotional, exhausting week in a long time.

What a pleasure to get up this morning and simply ask yourself whether you might back a few winners today. Maybe you are off to Ascot – a no less spectacular arena than Wembley, and erected, lest we forget, with far more efficiency. Or maybe you will savour the gradual restoration of jumping, like ripening fruit, to terrestrial television. By routinely embracing peril, after all, jump jockeys help to keep the Turf’s heroic spirit alive.

Over the past week, curious outsiders have seen its greatest European prize won by a man who the next day joined five others in the Old Bailey, to deny charges of conspiracy to defraud. So that is how racing finds itself this morning: drained, tense. Just the same, in other words, as millions of working men and women, looking for release in the harmless intensity of a sporting Saturday.

Nobody could really face a big race today. Let’s just have a few bets and then sit back and enjoy the ball games.

In fairness, the four-year-olds’ hurdle at Chepstow is probably the best race of the jumps season to date. Liberate earned top weight by beating all bar Katchit in the Triumph Hurdle at Cheltenham, but looks vulnerable in trying to give weight to Gwanako (2.0), who was unbeaten in five starts in France and is now making his debut for the champion trainer.

Conversely, Natal (next best 1.25) could still be very fairly treated under top weight when he represents the same stable and jockey in the opener. Just below the best novices over fences last season, he remains unexposed at this distance and just needs to get into a rhythm over this awkward track.

He certainly has the right man on board for that job. And so long as people can spend their Saturday afternoons marvelling at men like Ruby Walsh, then racing need not feel too abashed.

Ibn Khaldun follows in Nayef’s steps

Previous winners of the Deloitte Autumn Stakes – run for a 10th time at Ascot today – include three subsequent Group One scorers in Dr Fong, Daliapour and Nayef. And two years ago, when it was run at Salisbury, no less a horse than Dylan Thomas was beaten a neck into second.

Nayef had announced himself less equivocally, winning by six lengths in 2000. Without wishing to set him up for a fall, it would be no surprise to see something similar from Ibn Khaldun (3.00) after his astounding performance in a nursery here 13 days ago.

The caveat is that he must have made a fairly generous effort, no matter how serene it looked, and has not had long to recover. The ground will be softer this time, too. All things being equal, however, he can consolidate Godolphin’s overdue return to the top table with its juveniles.

Last Sunday Rio De La Plata confirmed himself a legitimate Classic candidate for next year, and this is Ibn Khaldun’s chance to do the same. Admittedly, the horses he beat last time could hardly qualify him as such, on their own account, but the way he cruised past them all heightened the huge promise of his two previous starts.

He can be watched on Channel 4, whereas the three previous races are on BBC2. His stable, still in great form, also has an interesting candidate for the Ladbrokes Handicap, the lightly raced blueblood MARIOTTO (nap 2.20) being just 4lb higher than when winning over an inadequate distance on his return. Freshened up after disappointing at Goodwood, he will find this test on easy ground right up his street.

Channel 4 is also at York, where Richard Fahey wears belt and braces in the Paddy Power Sprint Handicap, his two runners looking best among those drawn high and low respectively – with marginal preference for Fonthill Road (3.45).

Dylan testimony to O’Brien’s genius

Only a footnote, but that is all he managed to get on Monday, as well – when Aidan O’Brien deserved many headlines in his own right for a first success in the Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe. In the singular circumstances, nobody was going to look much past Kieren Fallon. But the fact is that no previous Arc winner can ever have soaked up such a tough campaign, and the suspicion must be that no Arc winner has ever had a better trainer.

A fortnight today, of course, we will all be wondering whether the Arc might finally have pushed even Dylan Thomas over the edge. He will have made a long transatlantic journey into the bargain. But he will almost certainly win the Breeders’ Cup Turf, even without the assistance of Fallon. True, he has never been beaten on this horse, and his mental detachment on Sunday was the stuff of legend. But Fallon’s are not the only hands to have touched Dylan Thomas with genius.

Brisk Breeze keeps Cecil on course

Henry Cecil is finishing the season with his horses back in the same groove that led them to such a profitable spring. One good example is Brisk Breeze (1.45), who can build on her progress this autumn at Ascot today, and another could well be Passage Of Time.

Sadly, however, it emerged yesterday that this filly will not be inviting the Americans to revisit Cecil’s exotic talent at the Breeders’ Cup, as had been planned. She will instead pop down the road for the Emirates Champion Stakes at Newmarket next Saturday.

Chris McGrath

NAP: Mariotto (Ascot 2.20)

NB: Natal (Chepstow 1.25).

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Source: sport.independent.co.uk

Oct 13

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — Michigan’s Mike Hart was injured in the first half against Purdue on Saturday, and was not in uniform after halftime.

The senior running back appeared to hurt his right ankle when he was tackled by Anthony Haygood.

Hart ran for 102 yards and two touchdowns in the first half — helping the Wolverines build a 24-point lead — and set a school rushing record with his seventh straight 100-yard game.

Brandon Minor, Hart’s backup, limped off the field during the first drive of the second half after he appeared to hurt his left ankle. Minor was later carted off the field, and replaced by Carlos Brown.

Hart became Michigan’s career rushing leader last week and entered Saturday’s game leading the nation with 976 yards this season and 4,655 in his career.

Against the Boilermakers, Hart moved past Wisconsin’s Anthony Davis for fifth among the Big Ten’s career rushing leaders. He trails Wisconsin’s Ron Dayne — who ran for a conference-record 7,125 yards — Ohio State’s Archie Griffin, Indiana’s Anthony Thompson and Michigan State’s Lorenzo White.

Hart finished fifth in Heisman Trophy voting last year.

Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press

Source: sports.espn.go.com

Oct 13


Click to Play In this episode I extol the virtues of the nine hole round and explore the pleasures of a surprisingly delightful golf snack. There’s also some happy Poulter news.

Source: thegolfgirl.blogspot.com

Oct 13

By:

I will explain why positive affirmations work for some people sometimes, and why it doesn’t for some other people, some other times. I will also introduce a powerful new alternative twist to positive affirmations that works - almost as instantaneously or quicker than what mere repetition of traditional positive affirmations can do for you.

The Missing Link in Positive Affirmations.

It happens almost every time, to almost every person who has at least tried a positive affirmations technique before.

You repeat to yourself, over and over again, “Every day, in every way, I am getting better and better”.

Or maybe, if you’re looking to lose weight (I’m looking to gain weight. Wait till you see how small my body is), you try this affirmation, “I am getting thinner every day”.

Or even worse, this, “I am a thin and beautiful person”. No, you don’t want to! Believe me! Alright, weight-loss is not the topic of this article. Let me get to the point.

What do you see in common with the 3 examples of positive affirmations above?

ONE: These positive affirmations are extremely vague, abstract.

The statements you see above, which most of you (who are into the positive affirmations thing) repeat to yourself every day, have no specific, tangible value attached to it to make it progress-oriented.

Just look at the first one (invented by Emile Coue), “Every day, in every way, I am getting better and better”. Getting better and better at what? Fooling yourself? Messing yourself up? Sorry, friend, “… in every way …”, to your notorious subconscious mind may include the two negative things mentioned earlier.

Or the “I am getting thinner every day” affirmation. Thinner in what way? In bone size? In brain matter size? The word “thinner” itself subliminally suggests lack, which is the opposite of abundance.

To make your positive affirmations more effective, you need a specific, tangible value to it. Such as, “Every day, in every positive beneficial area of my life, I am increasing my effectiveness, productivity and efficiency by 1%”. 1% improvement may be small, but it is workable.

But this is only one stage of the journey. As you read on, you will witness the evolution of this positive affirmation.

TWO: These positive affirmations are expressing something which is far from the truth right now.

Let’s say you have acne. I have acne. I still have after I’ve tried numerous prescriptions, from Proactiv to Oxy to what-have-yous. But fortunately, my condition is improving.

But let’s say you have really bad acne, like I once did when I was 15. Really, really bad acne. Scars, blackheads, whiteheads, red spots, rough, dry, itchy skin, with oily patches. Eugh… Sorry, I just had to implant the image into your mind to make you understand better.

And since you want to try this positive affirmations thingy, you say to yourself, “I have a clean and clear skin”, or “My skin is becoming cleaner and clearer every day”.

Now try saying that straight-faced to your friend… (Beat) I rest my case.

What’s wrong with these affirmations?

Number one, “I have a clean and clear skin” is one heck of an outright, outrageous, big, fat, ugly lie to say to yourself if you really have that bad case of acne described above!

And who is any worse to lie to than your good, old, beloved Self?

Number two, if you’re just going to stop at affirmations, and not do anything about your condition, you’re obviously not going to get anywhere!

What’s the missing ingredient here? Action. Which is what I’ll address in point number…

THREE: These positive affirmations are not action-oriented.

Every great achievement that has ever been accomplished in this world has been accomplished by action. Don’t go believing in the New Age “Zen”-ish “Go with the Flow” concept - even that requires action.

If you want to “go with the flow”, isn’t that an action in itself? “GO” is an action, isn’t it?

What’s the use if you only stop at dreaming (or the more constructive form, Creative Visualization), or doing positive affirmations, and not do anything to attain your desires?

Besides making your positive affirmations specific and more “truthful”, you can add an action-oriented dimension to it by suggesting what you’re going to do to get your desired results and affirming that you’re doing it well.

This may seem like making an initially short and simple affirmation into a prolonged and complicated one. You can break that one affirmation into many, if you like.

For instance, if you wish to gain weight, you’d say, “Every day, in every way, I am taking proactive steps towards achieving my ideal, healthy weight in a motivated and effective manner”.

The difference between “I am at my ideal weight” or “I am gaining weight every day” and the above is that the previous two do not deal with what you’re going to do to achieve your ideal weight and with the current reality (I’m all skin and bones) while the latter tells your subconscious mind everything (almost) it needs to know.

FOUR: These positive affirmations are not “Editor-Proof”.

What I mean by the Editor in “Editor-Proof” is the little voice in your head that you sometimes - no, constantly - hear.

You say, “I am getting better every day”. Your Editor says, “Yeah, right.”

You affirm to yourself, “I am opening myself to wealth and abundance around me”. Your Editor retaliates with, “What are you going to do about it?”

These kinds of attacks can weaken the power of your positive affirmations if they’re not made “Editor-Proof”.

Sometimes, your Editor can come up with a “pre-emptive strike” (ring a bell?) in the forms of negative self-statements like, “I’m a good for nothing. Nothing I can do to improve my condition will work anyway, so why bother?” or “I’ve failed many times before, I’ll surely fail again. I should just move on”.

While this Editor may be useful in some ways sometimes, like pulling you back to reality after a bout of unconstructive fantasising, you can reduce its hold over you if you want to get something out of your positive affirmations.

First, see your Editor as a friend, not your enemy. Albeit, a mere good friend, but not certainly your BEST friend. Approach your Editor as you would approach someone you’re not afraid of, someone you can easily deal with and influence, not an authoritarian figure.

Second, try to listen to what your Editor says in rebuttal to your positive statements. Write them down and think of re-writing your affirmations to evade the Editor.

A good way to do this, that is, to evade the Editor is to turn your positive affirmations into questions.

For example, if you are affirming, “I am at my ideal weight”, turn it into a couple of constructive, effective questions like:

“Why is it important that I must be at my ideal weight?”

“How can I achieve my ideal weight?”

“What must I do to achieve my ideal weight?”

“What would it be like, feel like, when I have achieved my ideal weight?”

Questions tend to shift your mind’s attention away from the possible blocks to your goals and focus instead on what proactive steps to do to achieve it.

Questions are like swords (because of their sharp, focused nature) to help you defend yourself against the Editor’s attacks.

FIVE: These positive affirmations do not address what I call the “3-Person Subconscious Truth-Verifier” concept.

The 3-Person Subconscious Truth-Verifier is simply stating your affirmations in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd person all at once.

Instead of just, “Every day, in every positive beneficial area of my life, I am increasing my effectiveness, productivity and efficiency by 1%”, you can also state -

“Every day, in every positive beneficial area of your life, you are increasing your effectiveness, productivity and efficiency by 1%”, and -

“Every day, in every positive beneficial area of his (or you can place your name here) life, he is increasing his effectiveness, productivity and efficiency by 1%”

What this does is to attack the problem 3-fold.

One, when you state the affirmation in the 1st person, you are affirming something which you yourself know to be true.

Two, when you state the affirmation in the 2nd person, you are feeding that part of your mind which needs outside opinion to help form what you see yourself as. A part of us needs someone to verify our worth, to praise us, to confirm outside what we believe inside. This helps to fill that need.

Three, when you state the affirmation in the 3rd person, you are also still feeding that need mentioned above, but taken to another level. This time, it’s as if we are eavesdropping on other people’s opinions about us.

It’s a little tricky to explain. But this is the best attempt I can come up with. All you have to do is try it!

Hence, these 5 points form the missing link in positive affirmations. Next, let me introduce a powerful new alternative twist to positive affirmations that will work wonders for you.

A Powerful New Alternative Twist to Positive Affirmations.

As I’ve explained above, one of the major obstructions to the effectiveness of positive affirmations is the Editor which constantly rebuts you with negative or sceptical statements.

To evade the Editor’s attacks, one can turn to questions. Why questions? That is a good question.

Questions are the laser of your mind. They help you focus, keep your mind’s attention on one and only one thing - the answer.

It was Einstein who said that if he were to be killed, and had only 1 hour to figure out how to save his own life, he would devote 55 minutes into finding the right question. Then, he said, finding the answer would only take 5 minutes.

Even self-help guru Anthony Robbins described about the power of questions in affecting our lives.

But still, I haven’t answered the question of how and why questions can evade the Editor and help bring about the transformation that positive affirmations are supposed to effect.

You see, what we focus on, consistently, and attach importance and energy to (whether willingly or not), we get.

And since questions that are constructive, goal-oriented, proactive, and hence, effective shift our focus from the problem that the Editor may pose to the solution, we get the results of that solution.

It doesn’t matter whether or not we immediately know the solution to our question. Our subconscious minds will surely find a way, if you pose the question to it clearly enough.

Like I said above, a question that is sharp and precise enough is like a sword that will cut through the depths of your subconscious mind right to the core, wherein lies your answer.

Compare this to the loosely crafted positive affirmations that do not address the 5 missing links above. Before these affirmations can reach deep enough inside the subconscious mind, they’re attacked, stripped, torn apart by the malicious negative statements of the Editor.

Alright, here’s how you go about the Effective Questioning technique.

One, consider those 5 missing links written above before you create your affirmation.

Two, create your affirmation. It must be:

- As specific as possible,

- As close to the truth as possible,

- Action-oriented,

- Editor-Proof,

- Stated in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd persons simultaneously.

Three, using only the affirmation stated in the 1st person, turn it into a question.

- Make a “Why” question from it. A “Why” question confirms your purpose, your reason, the motivating reason why you must have this outcome you want.

- A “How” question focuses your mind on the course of action you need to take to achieve that outcome. It focuses on the solutions.

- A “What if” question engages your imagination to foresee the benefits you’ll gain from the achievement of your outcome. This question focuses you on the goal.

- Once you’ve prepared the 3 “I-You-He/She/Your Name” affirmation statements as well as the 3 “Why-How-What if” questions by writing them down on paper, you can put them to good use by either writing them down 15 times a day or repeating them to yourself while in a relaxed, alert state.

I urge you to really take some time each day, with a pen and paper in hand, and try this method. If possible, record any noticeable changes in your thinking, in your moods, in your behaviours and even in your life.

Because if you mould your thoughts, you will surely most effectively mould your life as well. It’s a ripple effect.

Mohamad Latiff is the Author of the Ultimate Secrets of Success Blog where you can learn 40 of the Most Zealously-Guarded Ultimate Success Secrets of all Time.

Source: ju-sport.blogspot.com

Oct 13

Venus Williams

Bangkok, Thailand (Sports Network) - Wimbledon champion Venus Williams was an upset victim Saturday in the semifinals of the Bangkok Open, as Flavia Pennetta of Italy knocked off the former world No. 1 star.

The seventh-seeded Pennetta posted a 6-4, 7-6 (10-8) victory and will face Chinese Taipei’s Chan Yung-Jan in Sunday’s final. Chan was a 7-5, 3-6, 7-5 winner over China’s Yan Zi.

Williams was trying to reach her third straight WTA Tour final. She won the Korea Open two weeks ago, beating Pennetta in the semifinals, and lost to Virginie Razzano in last week’s Japan Open title match.

Pennetta, meanwhile, had lost in the semifinals in each of the last two weeks. After dropping a 6-2, 6-2 decision to Williams in Seoul, she lost to Razzano in last week’s Japan semifinals.

Sunday will mark Pennetta’s second WTA title match of 2007. She lost to Emilie Loit in Acapulco back in March and is 3-6 all-time in finals. The last of her three titles came in Acapulco in 2005.


 

Chan will play in a WTA singles final for the first time in her career. She has four career doubles crowns, including three this year. Her best previous finish in singles play was a semifinal appearance at the 2006 Japan Open.

Pennetta and Chan will meet for the first time on Sunday.

The winner will claim $28,161.


Source: www.tsn.ca

Oct 13

WASHINGTON (AP) — A House committee that criticized the NFL’s retiree benefit system asked the league and the players’ union Friday to turn over information on football injuries, the disability and retirement system and what’s being done to help battered and broken retirees.

The House Judiciary Committee has arranged for the Congressional Research Service, an investigative and research unit, to conduct an independent study of those questions as well, committee leaders said in letters to the National Football League and the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA).

“Several members of the committee have suggested that Congress should intervene to fix what has been described as a broken system of delivering disability benefits to former NFL players,” according to a letter from Reps. John Conyers, D-Mich., and Lamar Smith, R-Texas. “The CRS study will provide the essential facts to help us consider what steps, if any, Congress could take on this issue in the future.” Conyers is the committee chairman and Smith is the ranking GOP member.

The NFL and the union have until Oct. 26 to turn over the information and answer the committee’s questions. The panel has not decided whether to hold additional hearings, a spokeswoman said.

“It is common for former players to suffer lingering injuries from their playing days,” Conyers said. “I am greatly concerned that many of those most debilitated by their injuries are finding it difficult to receive disability benefits.”

Added Smith: “I am hopeful that the NFL and NFLPA will get their own house in order without any help from Congress.”

Retired football players have been openly critical of the NFL and the players’ union over the amount of money that older retirees get from a $1.1 billion fund set aside for disability and pensions.

In congressional testimony, retired NFL players have told sympathetic lawmakers about the multiple surgeries, mental illnesses and other problems many suffer after years of playing the violent sport, all the while trying to fight through the red tape of the NFL and NFLPA’s disability system.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell defended their system in a September Senate hearing, saying the NFL is boosting benefits when many companies around the country are reducing them. But he acknowledged that there have to be ways to improve.

Gene Upshaw, director of the players association, told the Senate that Congress should give the players’ union greater authority to approve disability claims.

The players’ union wants Congress to change federal law so it has more power on the retirement board that reviews disability claims. Under current law, the union can only name three retired former players to the board. NFL owners appoint the other three representatives.

The union is also asking Congress to tweak worker compensation laws and eliminate some of the layers of bureaucracy that make it harder for claims to be honored.

——

On the Net:

House Judiciary Committee: http://judiciary.house.gov

House Judiciary letter and questions for NFL: http://judiciary.house.gov/Media/PDFS/Goodell071012.pdf

House Judiciary letter and questions for NFLPA: http://judiciary.house.gov/Media/PDFS/Upshaw071012.pdf

NFL: http://www.nfl.com

NFLPA: http://www.nflpa.org

Source: www.sportingnews.com

Oct 13
Steve Staunton says the evening kick-off will help his team

Republic of Ireland v Germany
Croke Park
Saturday, 13 October
Kick-off: 1945 BST
Coverage on BBC Radio 5live & the BBC Sport website

Steve Staunton has used alleged comments by German Football officials to try and fire up his players ahead of Saturday’s Euro 2008 qualifier.

The Republic of Ireland boss claimed a “very high-up” delegation derided his team, Croke Park and the Irish fans after the game against Wales in March.

However, it has been revealed that the delegation was three little-known German Football Federation officials.

“We will use that to motivate the players,” insisted Staunton.

The German officials at the centre of the controversy were DFB head of ticketing Katja Sichtig, head of events Peter Radziwill and security chief Martin Spitzl.

Staunton claimed that Irish players and supporters would have been annoyed by the Germans’ comments.

“They weren’t very complimentary about Croke Park, about the crowd and the atmosphere in the ground not being very good, or about our chances,” said the Republic manager.

“They said the pitch was too far away from the supporters and the fans did not have an effect on the team.

It certainly helps it’s a night-time game


Steve Staunton

“If they had been there for the Slovakia game then they might have come away with a different attitude.”

When asked who made the accusations, Staunton replied: “I’m not going to name names, but it was a German delegation, very high up.”

Despite Staunton’s apparent annoyance, there was a widespread perception of a subdued atmosphere at Croke Park during the game against Wales in March as the Republic struggled to claim a 1-0 win.

The atmosphere against the Slovaks was vastly different, notably because it was an evening kick-off for which Irish fans are always more vocal and fervent and Staunton is pleased that Saturday’s game is a 1945 BST start.

“It certainly helps it’s a night-time game. It always does. There is a special atmosphere, a different feel about it. Anybody will tell you that.”

It is a game the Republic have to win if they are to keep alive their threadbare hopes of qualification.

They have to win their remaining three matches, whilst at the same time hoping the Czech Republic fail to acquire the three points they need from their final trio of games to claim the runners-up spot.

Unbeaten Germany, who have dropped just two points from their eight matches, need only a draw to guarantee their place in the finals in Switzerland and Austria next year.


Source: news.bbc.co.uk

Oct 13

England

3-0

Estonia

Wright-Phillips 11, Rooney 32, Rahn og 33

 

 

UEFA European Championship Qualifier
3pm, Saturday 13 October 2007
Wembley Stadium
Live on BBC1

42

Shaun Wright-Phillips bursts into the area and beats two defenders before losing his footing. The crowd calls for a penalty but the referee waves away any appeal.

38

Estonia get their first shot on target and Paul Robinson deals with it comfortably. Joel Lindpere took the ball down after a period of head tennis, before driving the ball from 20 yards.

33

GOAL! Taavi Rahn is the unfortunate Estonian as he heads an Ashley Cole cross past his own keeper to put England three goals ahead.

32

GOAL! Wayne Rooney marks his return to the side with his first competitive goal for England since Euro 2004. A fine left-footed cross from Joe Cole provided the opportunity and Rooney drove the ball past Poom.

27

A flurry of tackles as first Gareth Barry wins the ball superbly, and then Wayne Rooney is fouled on the edge of the box to set up a free kick for the Manchester United forward.

25

Joe Cole shows determination on the left flank to win the ball back and then fine footwork to set England off on another attack with Ashley Cole.

22

Two close offside decisions in close proximity as first Michael Owen and then Wayne Rooney look to get beyond the Estonian defence, but are denied by the assistant referee.

19

Wayne Rooney almost grabs a spectacular second goal as he tries a delightful chip over Mart Poom. Unfortunately for Rooney the ball lands on top of the goal.

18

Sol Campbell is forced to cover some extra ground as Kaimar Saag threatens on the left flank, but Campbell shows pace and poise to snuff out the threat.

15

The sun is shining at Wembley as spectators are forced to shield their eyes from the light. It’s a bright start in more ways than one.

14

Estonia win a threatening corner, but are unable to make anything of it and England clear their lines comfortably.

11

GOAL! Shaun Wright-Phillips caps a stubborn move that saw a ferocious Rooney effort blocked, before the Chelsea winger drove the ball through Mart Poom’s legs.

9

Steven Gerrard drives onto a loose header from an Estonian defender, but overplays his through pass to Wayne Rooney.

7

Ashley Cole sends a deflected cross into the area and Shaun Wright-Phillips almost makes it his, but is denied at the last moment.

6

Despite receiving lengthy treatment, both Micah Richards and Ragnar Klavan return to the field and the action.

4

England put together a fine move with Gerrard, Rooney and Barry combining well before Joe Cole sends a deep cross into the box. Micah Richards sustains a blow to the head in a collision.

2

Estonia fire off the first shot of the game, it’s from distance though and Paul Robinson watches it drift past his post.

1

Some neat passes to start the game as England search for three points in their pursuit of qualification for Euro 2008.

Estonia have got the game started and are going from right to left, England are wearing their home kit of white, blue and white.

Team details:

England: 1 Paul Robinson, (Tottenham Hotspur), 2 Micah Richards, (Manchester City), 3 Ashley Cole, (Chelsea), 4 Steven Gerrard (c), (Liverpool), 5 Rio Ferdinand, (Manchester United), 6 Sol Campbell, (Portsmouth), 7 Gareth Barry, (Aston Villa), 8 Shaun Wright Phillips, (Chelsea), 9 Wayne Rooney, (Manchester United), 10 Michael Owen, (Newcastle United), 11 Joe Cole, (Chelsea)

Subs: 12 Joleon Lescott, (Everton), 13 David James, (Portsmouth), 14 Phil Neville, (Everton), 15 Frank Lampard, (Chelsea), 16 David Bentley, (Blackburn Rovers), 17 Peter Crouch, (Liverpool), 18 Jermain Defoe, (Tottenham Hotspur),

Head Coach: Steve McClaren

Estonia: 1 Mart Poom (c), 3 Andrei Stepanov, 4 Raio Piiroja, 5 Dmitri Kruglov, 6 Aleksandr Dmitrijev, 9 Ragner Klavan, 10 Joel Lindpere, 15 Tarmo Kink, 17 Enar Jaager, 18 Kaimar Saag, 21 Taavi Rahn

Subs: 2 Teet Allas, 7 Martin Reim, 13 Urmas Rooba, 19 Alo Barengrub, 24 Kristen Viikmae, 29 Sergei Terehhov, 30 Mihkel Aksalu

Coach: Viggo Jensen 

Match Official Details:

Referee: Nicolai Vollquartz (Denmark)

Assistant Referees: Anders Norrestrand, Bo Abildgaard (Both Denmark)

Fourth Official: Thomas Vejlgaard

Source: www.thefa.com

Oct 13

Torres: Leg injury

Fernando Torres will miss the Merseyside derby after suffering a leg injury while training with Spain.

The Liverpool striker is facing at least 10 days on the sidelines after damaging a muscle in his right leg during a training session on Friday ahead of the Euro 2008 qualifier against Denmark.

That means the 23-year-old is now out of the eagerly-anticipated Premier League derby against Everton at Goodison Park on 20th October.

News of the injury will be come as a major blow to Liverpool boss Rafael Benitez following Torres’ impressive start to the season.

Spain coach Luis Aragones, meanwhile, is now likely to call on Espanyol’s Raul Tamudo against Denmark.

  • Liverpool fixtures
  • Liverpool stats
  • Liverpool forum

Source: www.skysports.com